Home / Fundraising / Valuation

Valuation

Valuation for Indian startups, both sides. Fundraising valuation (DCF, comparables, Berkus, Scorecard) for negotiating with investors. Regulatory FMV (Rule 11UA, FEMA NDI Rules 2019) for the certificates statutory share issuances require. FEMA reports signed by our CAs; SEBI Merchant Banker and IBBI Registered Valuer coordinated for transactions that require them.

Talk to a CA
Response within 30 mins during business hours

The Valuation Workflow.

Four sequential stages from brief to signed report. Typical timeline: 2-4 weeks for a fundraising valuation; 1-2 weeks for a standalone FEMA / regulatory FMV where projections already exist; longer for combined engagements. Reports valid for 90 days under FEMA, fresh certification required if allotment delayed beyond.

Stage 1
Brief & scope decision
Why is the valuation needed: fundraising negotiation, FEMA reporting (FC-GPR), Section 62 preferential allotment, Section 42 private placement, ESOP grant pricing, secondary transfer, or multiple purposes. Scope determines methods, who signs the certificate, and validity. Most engagements need more than one report; we map this upfront.
→
Stage 2
Method selection & build
Method chosen based on stage and use case. DCF for operating businesses with credible projections. Comparable companies / transactions for growth-stage. Berkus / Scorecard for pre-revenue. NAV for asset-heavy. Rule 11UA if mandated by use case. Two or more methods triangulated; weights documented. Internationally accepted methodology under FEMA NDI Rules 2019.
→
Stage 3
Cross-check & sensitivity
Output range cross-checked against secondary method, public comps, and recent precedent transactions. Sensitivity analysis on key drivers: discount rate, terminal growth, exit multiple. For fundraising: pre / post-money math, dilution waterfall, ESOP pool sizing. For regulatory: assumptions documentation prepared to the standard expected by AD Banks and the Income Tax Department under audit.
→
Stage 4
Report & certification
Final deliverable: signed valuation report with methodology, assumptions, computations, sensitivity, and certification page. For FEMA reports, signed by our CAs (qualified under NDI Rules 2019 for unlisted company transactions). For swap transactions, complex cross-border, or where mandated: coordinated with SEBI-registered Category I Merchant Banker or IBBI Registered Valuer. Report valid 90 days; refresh before that if allotment delayed.
↺ One-time per use case. A single round can generate multiple valuations: one for investor negotiation, one for FEMA filing post-allotment, sometimes one for the ESOP grant in the same window. We scope all of these together at the start so the methodology stays consistent across reports.

What Is Valuation?

Valuation for a private Indian company is two distinct workstreams that founders frequently conflate. Fundraising valuation is the number on the term sheet, what investors negotiate around, anchored in DCF, comparable companies, comparable transactions, or stage-appropriate frameworks like Berkus and Scorecard. Regulatory valuation is the certificate the law requires for actually issuing shares, mandated by FEMA Non-Debt Instruments Rules 2019 for foreign investment, by the Companies Act for preferential allotment and private placement, and by Income Tax rules in specific situations. Both can be required in the same round.

A typical Series A round needs three valuation outputs: (1) the negotiated valuation used in the term sheet, (2) the FEMA-compliant valuation report filed alongside FC-GPR within 30 days of allotment (mandatory if any foreign investor is on the cap table), and (3) often an ESOP grant valuation done in the same window to set strike price. Founders engaging only on the first end up with FEMA non-compliance flagged 6-18 months later when audit or AD Bank queries surface; founders engaging only on the second have no anchor for negotiation. We scope all of these together at engagement start.

Key 2026 update: Angel tax is abolished

The Finance Act 2024 abolished Section 56(2)(viib) of the Income Tax Act, the “angel tax”, with effect from April 1, 2025 for all classes of investors (resident and non-resident). For fund raises post that date, the share premium received above FMV is no longer taxed as “income from other sources.” This is a material change most CA firm websites have not updated yet. Two caveats: legacy assessments for AY 2024-25 and prior years remain open and can still trigger demands; and Rule 11UA continues to be relevant for other purposes, FEMA pricing, Section 62 preferential allotment, registered valuer requirements under Section 42, and slump sale or buyback transactions under Rule 11UAA.

Who can sign which certificate

Indian valuation regulations distinguish between report types. FEMA valuation reports for unlisted company share issuances or transfers (most fundraising transactions involving foreign investors) can be signed by a Chartered Accountant with Certificate of Practice, a SEBI-registered Category I Merchant Banker, or a practicing Cost Accountant, per NDI Rules 2019. Swap transactions, complex cross-border deals, and certain higher-threshold cases require a SEBI Merchant Banker specifically. Section 42 private placement reports require an IBBI Registered Valuer under the Companies (Registered Valuers and Valuation) Rules 2017. Section 62 preferential allotment may need a registered valuer depending on the case. Slump sale and buyback under Rule 11UAA require a registered valuer.

How we work the credential mix

We are Chartered Accountants with Certificates of Practice, qualified to sign FEMA valuation reports for the bulk of unlisted company transactions. For matters requiring a different credential, SEBI Merchant Banker certification (swap transactions, complex cross-border), IBBI Registered Valuer certification (Section 42 / Section 62 / Rule 11UAA cases), we coordinate with registered partners and integrate their certification into the deliverable. You get one engagement, one consistent methodology, one project lead, and the right credential signing the right report. This is meaningfully better than running parallel engagements with separate vendors who do not coordinate.

What's in scope and what's not

This page covers valuation for fundraising and statutory share-issuance compliance: DCF and comps for investor negotiation; Rule 11UA and FEMA reports for filings; ESOP grant valuation; secondary transfer valuation. Not covered here: M&A advisory and deal structuring (a separate engagement); fairness opinions for listed-company transactions (requires a different scope); insolvency-stage valuation under IBC (specific registered valuer regime); tax-court valuation defence in disputed cases (litigation support). For ongoing FP&A and budgeting see Virtual CFO; for the underlying projections that feed valuation, see Financial Model.

What Gets Done Each Cycle.

Six methods used across fundraising and regulatory valuation. Method choice depends on stage, use case, and regulatory requirement. Most engagements triangulate two or more.

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF)
Income method
Future free cash flows discounted to present value at an appropriate WACC, with a terminal value. Best for operating businesses with credible 5-year projections. FEMA-acceptable internationally recognised methodology. Sensitive to discount rate, terminal growth, exit multiple, sensitivity analysis is mandatory.
Comparable companies / transactions
Market method
Trading multiples of listed comps or transaction multiples from recent precedent deals. Common for growth-stage rounds and FEMA reports where DCF is unstable. Adjustments for size, growth, margins, geography. Investors cross-check fundraising valuations against this even when DCF leads.
Berkus & Scorecard
Early-stage
For pre-revenue or early-revenue companies where DCF projections are not credible. Berkus attributes value to specific company milestones (idea, prototype, team, strategic relationships, sales). Scorecard compares to recent regional comparable seed valuations across weighted criteria. Used for investor negotiation; not a typical regulatory method.
Net Asset Value (NAV)
Asset method
Book value adjusted to fair value of assets minus liabilities. Used for asset-heavy businesses (manufacturing, infrastructure, real-estate-linked). Often as a secondary cross-check alongside DCF or comps for FEMA reports. Lower-bound anchor in distressed or asset-rich situations.
Rule 11UA FMV
Regulatory
Income Tax Rules 1962 method for fair market value of unquoted equity shares. NAV method with prescribed adjustments, or DCF certified by merchant banker. Still relevant for FEMA reporting context, Section 62 preferential allotment, registered valuer requirements, and any legacy Section 56(2)(viib) assessments under audit.
Cross-check & sensitivity
Every report
Every report triangulates output across two or more methods. Sensitivity analysis on key drivers: discount rate, terminal growth, exit multiple, comparable selection. AD Banks, Income Tax officers, and registered valuers expect this; reports without it are returned for revision. We build it as standard, not as an upsell.

When You Need Us to Handle This.

Valuation crosses two regimes (negotiation and regulation) with different rules, methods, and consequences for getting it wrong. Here's when professional handling is essential.

Get help if
  • You have any foreign investor on the cap table. FEMA Non-Debt Instruments Rules 2019 require a fair valuation certificate by a qualified professional (CA, SEBI Merchant Banker, or Cost Accountant) before share issuance or transfer between resident and non-resident. Skipping this triggers RBI compounding penalties and complicates future fundraises. Mandatory; not optional.
  • You're negotiating a Series A or later round. Investor-side analysts will independently model your valuation and challenge yours where it diverges. Without a defensible DCF backed by comparable companies and sensitivity analysis, the negotiation tilts to the investor anchor. Method triangulation is what holds your number.
  • You're granting ESOPs and need a defensible strike price. ESOP grant valuations affect both employees (tax on perquisite at exercise) and the company (later 409A-style audit if pursuing US listing). Strike pricing below FMV creates tax exposure for grantees; pricing above leaves them out of the money. Same window as funding round usually.
  • You're doing a Section 42 private placement or Section 62 preferential allotment. Companies Act 2013 requires IBBI Registered Valuer certification for Section 42; Section 62 cases often need one too. CAs alone cannot sign these; the valuer must be registered under the Companies (Registered Valuers and Valuation) Rules 2017. We coordinate this end-to-end.
  • You have a legacy Section 56(2)(viib) assessment notice. Angel tax was abolished from April 1, 2025, but assessment years AY 2024-25 and prior remain open. Notices can still arrive demanding tax on premiums received above the then-FMV. These need a Rule 11UA-compliant valuation defence prepared in the form the AO will accept.
Consider DIY if
  • You're raising only from resident angel investors with no FEMA filing. Post-April 2025 abolition of angel tax, resident-only fundraises by closely-held companies no longer need a Rule 11UA valuation for share issuance (Section 56(2)(viib) does not apply). A back-of-envelope number for negotiation may suffice. Note: Section 42 private placement compliance still applies; check with a CA.
  • You have a senior in-house CFO with valuation experience. Experienced CFOs can run DCF and comparable analysis for investor negotiation. The regulatory side still typically gets outsourced because of credential requirements (CA-signed for FEMA; IBBI Registered Valuer for Section 42 / 62), but the negotiation analysis can be self-built with light review.
  • You're still in pre-revenue customer discovery. Valuations at this stage are largely negotiation-driven; method exercise is theatre. Berkus or Scorecard can be self-built. If you have to file FEMA reports later (foreign investor came in), professional valuation enters the picture then, not at idea stage.
  • Your business is genuinely simple and asset-driven. Asset-heavy businesses with predictable NAV can sometimes be valued with a templated NAV approach for regulatory purposes. We would still recommend triangulating against DCF or comps if you intend to use the report for investor negotiation, but a simple NAV may suffice for some standalone use cases.

How We Work.

Six commitments. CAs in-house signing FEMA valuation reports where qualified; SEBI Merchant Banker and IBBI Registered Valuer coordinated for transactions that require them. Method-triangulated, sensitivity-tested, ready for AD Bank, Income Tax, and investor scrutiny.

NDA before financials shared
Non-disclosure agreement signed before you share financials, projections, customer data, or transaction details. NDA binds everyone on the engagement, including any coordinated SEBI Merchant Banker or IBBI Registered Valuer partner where their credential is needed.
Report in 2-4 weeks, 1-2 if model exists
Fundraising valuation: 2-4 weeks. Standalone FEMA / regulatory report where projections already exist: 1-2 weeks. Combined engagements scoped at start. Reports valid 90 days under FEMA, refresh required if share allotment delayed beyond that window.
Method triangulation, not single-method
Two or more methods used per report, weighted appropriately, with reconciliation between outputs. DCF cross-checked against comps; NAV as floor where relevant. AD Banks expect this for FEMA; investors expect it for negotiation; we do it as standard.
Right credential signs the right report
FEMA valuation for most unlisted company transactions: our CAs sign. Swap transactions, complex cross-border: SEBI Merchant Banker coordinated. Section 42 / Section 62 / Rule 11UAA where mandated: IBBI Registered Valuer coordinated. One engagement, right credential on the report.
Assumptions documented to audit standard
Every assumption, discount rate, terminal growth, exit multiple, comp set, adjustments, documented in a dedicated section of the report. AD Banks and Income Tax officers under audit ask for this; reports without it are returned. Built so the report survives scrutiny 18 months after delivery.
Signed report + editable workings handed over
Final deliverables: signed valuation report (PDF) ready for FEMA filing or investor sharing, editable workings (Excel / Google Sheets) for your records, and a handover walkthrough. You retain the file; we are available for refresh certificates if allotment delayed beyond 90 days.

Why Valuations Get Challenged.

Valuations get challenged from two directions: investors during negotiation, regulators during compliance review. The failure patterns are predictable in both. The honest catalogue.

Risk if unregistered
Likelihood
Commercial impact
Single-method valuation (DCF only)
Investor + AD Bank concern
Triangulated against comparable companies / transactions and a secondary cross-check method
Stale valuation certificate (over 90 days)
FEMA compliance failure
Tracking and refreshing certificate before allotment; new report if delay exceeds 90 days
Wrong method for the use case
Regulator challenge
Method matched to use case: DCF for operating, comps for growth, NAV as floor, Rule 11UA where mandated
Hockey-stick DCF without driver logic
Investor-side analyst kill
Each year of growth tied to specific drivers, with sensitivity on discount rate, terminal growth, exit multiple
Inappropriate comparable companies
Investor + regulator challenge
Comps screened by stage, geography, business model, size, with adjustments documented for differences
Valuer not qualified for the transaction type
FEMA / Section 42 / 62 rejection
CA-signed for FEMA on most unlisted; SEBI Merchant Banker for swaps; IBBI Registered Valuer for Section 42 / Rule 11UAA
Undocumented discount rate or terminal growth
Audit / diligence pushback
Each input documented with source (risk-free rate, equity risk premium, beta, size premium) and reasoning
Negotiated valuation inconsistent with FEMA report
Future audit risk
Same methodology and inputs across negotiation and statutory reports; differences explained explicitly
Valuation is challenged by sophisticated audiences: investor-side analysts, AD Banks, Income Tax officers, and 18 months later in audit. Every failure pattern above is preventable with method triangulation, the right credential on the report, and documentation built to audit standard. Reports survive scrutiny long after the round closes.

Frequently Asked Questions.

Fundraising valuation is the number negotiated in a term sheet with investors, supported by DCF, comparable companies, or stage-appropriate frameworks like Berkus / Scorecard. It anchors deal negotiation but has no statutory force on its own. Regulatory valuation is the certificate the law requires for actually issuing shares, mandated by FEMA NDI Rules 2019 for foreign investment, by Section 42 / Section 62 of Companies Act 2013 for private placement and preferential allotment in specific cases, and historically by Section 56(2)(viib) of Income Tax (now abolished). Both can be required in the same round; we scope both upfront.
No, for new fund raises post April 1, 2025. The Finance Act 2024 abolished Section 56(2)(viib) entirely with effect from FY 2025-26, for all classes of investors (resident and non-resident). New share issuances at any premium no longer trigger angel tax. Two caveats: assessment years AY 2024-25 and prior remain open, demands may still arrive on old transactions and need to be defended with Rule 11UA documentation; and Rule 11UA continues to apply in other contexts, FEMA pricing, Section 42 / 62, registered valuer requirements, slump sale / buyback under Rule 11UAA. DPIIT recognition also remains relevant for Section 80-IAC tax holiday.
Yes, for most unlisted company transactions. Under FEMA Non-Debt Instruments Rules 2019, Chartered Accountants with Certificate of Practice are qualified to sign valuation certificates for issue and transfer of capital instruments between resident and non-resident parties for unlisted companies. Our CAs sign these. Exceptions where a different credential is needed: swap of capital instruments (SEBI Merchant Banker required), certain higher-threshold or complex cross-border transactions, and some specific structured deals. In those cases, we coordinate with a SEBI-registered Category I Merchant Banker partner who signs while we run the engagement.
When the transaction falls within scope of the Companies (Registered Valuers and Valuation) Rules 2017. Most common triggers: Section 42 private placement (registered valuer report required for valuation of share consideration), Section 62 preferential allotment in certain cases, Rule 11UAA for slump sale and share buyback under Income Tax Act, and IBC insolvency-stage valuation. A CA alone cannot sign these, the valuer must be registered with IBBI. We coordinate with IBBI Registered Valuer partners and integrate their report into the engagement.
90 days from the date of the certificate. The share allotment to the foreign investor must complete within this 90-day window. If the allotment is delayed beyond 90 days, a fresh valuation is required, there is no extension mechanism in NDI Rules 2019. Common practical issue: term sheet signed, board approval taken, but allotment delayed waiting for foreign investor remittance to clear. We track validity and refresh proactively if delay looks likely.
Fundraising valuation: 2-4 weeks from brief to signed report, faster if existing financial model is in good shape, longer if we need to build the model first. Standalone FEMA / regulatory valuation: 1-2 weeks if projections and historicals are ready. Combined fundraising + FEMA + ESOP: 3-5 weeks; we scope all reports together at engagement start to keep the methodology consistent. Expedited delivery possible for urgent allotments, with explicit trade-offs flagged.
Pricing depends on: (1) scope (fundraising-only, regulatory-only, or combined; single use case vs multiple); (2) method complexity (DCF + comps + NAV triangulation takes longer than NAV-only); (3) credential required (CA-signed FEMA report vs SEBI Merchant Banker vs IBBI Registered Valuer, the latter two have third-party costs); (4) turnaround. We quote a fixed engagement fee once scope is clear. Reach out for a specific quote.
Often yes, with caveats. The methodology and inputs should be consistent between investor negotiation and the FEMA report; large divergence creates future audit risk. However, the format and detail level differ: the FEMA report is a formal certificate with prescribed structure, the investor materials are typically a presentation deck with summary. We prepare both from the same underlying analysis. Timing matters: FEMA report must be dated within 90 days of allotment, often after the term sheet is signed but before share issuance.
Depends on stage and use case. DCF: best for operating businesses with credible 5-year projections (typical Series A+). Comparable companies / transactions: best for growth-stage where listed or transaction comps exist (typical Series A+, often paired with DCF). Berkus / Scorecard: best for pre-revenue or very early seed where DCF projections are not credible. NAV: best for asset-heavy businesses or as a secondary cross-check. Rule 11UA: required for specific regulatory use cases. Most engagements use two or more methods triangulated.
Yes. ESOP grant valuations set the strike price for option grants under your scheme. Important for both company tax position (perquisite tax on exercise is calculated on FMV at exercise minus strike) and employee outcomes (strike below FMV creates perquisite tax exposure at grant; strike above leaves grantees out of the money). Best practice: refresh ESOP grant valuation at each funding round so strike prices are anchored to current FMV. We coordinate this in the same window as fundraising / FEMA reports to keep methodology consistent.
Legacy assessments remain open and notices can still arrive demanding tax on premiums received above the then-FMV in transactions before April 1, 2025. The defence requires a Rule 11UA-compliant valuation prepared as of the date of the original transaction, supported by methodology, comparable evidence, and documented assumptions. We can backdate-prepare the defence valuation (using data available as of the transaction date), draft the assessment response, and represent at hearings. Time-sensitive: response deadlines under Income Tax Act apply.
Partial. The valuation work itself (DCF, comps, fairness opinion preparation) is within scope. Full M&A advisory, deal structuring, negotiation support, term sheet drafting, integration planning, is a separate engagement with broader scope. For pure M&A target valuation or acquirer-side valuation work, we can engage directly. For fairness opinions on listed-company transactions, the regulatory requirements (SEBI ICDR / SAST) are different and outside this page's scope, talk to us separately.

You Might Also Need.

Financial Model & Projections Pitch Deck Due Diligence Prep Cap Table Management FCGPR Reporting Virtual CFO

Anchor Your Valuation.

CAs in-house signing FEMA reports where qualified; SEBI Merchant Banker and IBBI Registered Valuer coordinated for the rest. Talk to a CA in 15 minutes.