Voluntary strike-off via Form STK-2 through C-PACE, NCLT winding up, or voluntary liquidation under IBC. Pick the right path, clean up compliance, and close the entity properly so directors stay protected.
Closure is not a single filing. It is a 4-stage workflow over 3-6 months: compliance cleanup, registrations cancelled, STK-2 filed via C-PACE, dissolution notice in the Official Gazette.
Closure of business is the legal process of dissolving a registered entity, Private Limited Company, One Person Company, LLP, or Section 8 Company, so it ceases to exist on the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) register. Closure is not a single filing; it is a 4-stage workflow that cleans up pending compliance, cancels statutory registrations, files the closure application, and ends with the dissolution notice published in the Official Gazette. The choice of path depends on the company's financial position, asset base, and operational history.
Most early-stage and inactive Indian companies use the voluntary strike-off route under Section 248(2) of the Companies Act, 2013 by filing Form STK-2. Since May 2023, all STK-2 applications are processed by the Centre for Processing Accelerated Corporate Exit (C-PACE), MCA's centralized authority that has cut typical strike-off timelines from over 2 years to under 4 months. The C-PACE route is the fastest and cheapest closure path, but it works only for companies with nil liabilities and no business operations for at least 2 financial years.
1. Voluntary Strike-off via STK-2: for nil-liability, non-operational companies. 3-6 months timeline. Costs ₹15,000-₹40,000 all-in. Most common path for failed startups, dormant entities, and shelf companies. 2. NCLT Winding Up (Sections 270-303 of Companies Act): for solvent companies with assets to distribute. Court-supervised, slower, more expensive. 3. Voluntary Liquidation under IBC Section 59: for solvent companies opting for IBC framework. 4. Insolvency under IBC: for insolvent companies, creditor-driven, NCLT-administered. We assess your specific situation and recommend the right path, no one-size-fits-all.
An inactive but un-closed company is a compliance liability, not a saved one. Annual filings continue to accrue, late fees compound at ₹100/day per missed form, and directors stay personally exposed under Section 164(2) (3-year disqualification for 3 consecutive years of non-filing) and Section 248(1) (suo-motu strike-off by ROC, which does deactivate DIN). Worst case: directors get disqualified across all companies they hold, including their next venture. Voluntary closure prevents all of this and protects director records.
Six activities across the closure workflow. From pre-closure compliance cleanup to STK-7 dissolution Gazette publication, end-to-end.
Closing a company is a one-time, irreversible decision. Here's when it's the right move and when an alternative (dormant status, sale, restart) makes more sense.
Six commitments. One dedicated CA from path assessment to dissolution Gazette.
What happens to an inactive but un-closed company, and to its directors. These are the costs voluntary closure prevents.
Talk to a CA in 15 minutes. Response within 30 mins during business hours.
We reply within an hour during business hours. No deck, no sales pitch.